Posted by By now, we know that mask wearing is pretty much useless and counterproductive. It’s mainly window dressing and a psychological placebo to mitigate paranoia about COVID. Even Dr. Fauci admitted this. On 10/21 2020, Dr. Fauci said:
“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.”
Aside from that, cloth masks like those Dr. Fauci is wearing in most of his pictures, are particularly ineffective. Even the best masks have pores that are still three to four times larger than the largest virus. They cannot retain viruses. But they can and do retain bacteria and fungi. Everything you breathe in and out gets stuck in those masks. The water contained in your breath creates a moist biotope in the mask material making it a breeding ground for germs of all kinds.
In a study about the Spanish Flu co-authored by Dr. Fauci, the authors wrote:
“…most victims of the Spanish Flu did not die from the Spanish Flu. They died from bacterial pneumonia.”
The inference is that they developed bacterial pneumonia, because they were wearing masks.
Wearing a mask outside or in your car, driving alone, is outright silly, since the SARS2 Cov virus is not airborne and there is nobody there to infect you except you yourself. Even the CDC guidelines say:
“In general, people do not need to wear masks when outdoors.”
Mask wearing impedes your respiration and aerobic breathing. This is particularly pernicious for children especially when they are supposed to engage in gymnastics or sports. According to an Italian study, young people between one and twenty years of age make up 0.002% of Corona deaths, provided we can trust the numbers. These numbers, however, are probably inflated, as in the early COVIC days no distinction was made between “died with COVID” and “died from COVID”. Even people who died in car accidents were counted as COVID deaths, if the obduction showed that they had SARS2 Cov in their blood.
When you engage in demanding physical activities, your body, your heart, your brain need more oxygen. This is why your breathing intensifies when you play football, soccer or Lacrosse or when you run or jump. Wearing a mask during these activities is like starving a combustion engine on air intake. It will choke and eventually stop running.
In addition to these adverse physical side effects, mask wearing also has negative socio-psychological side effects. Children, in particular small children and babies, need to see the facial expression of the adults with whom they are interacting and from whom they are learning human behavior and culture. The mask makes the mother, the father, ant, granny, teacher or friend an anonymous being. This depersonalizes and deindividualizes the entire socialization process.
It is commonly believed that women are better communicators than men. It seems they also depend more on communication than men. The mask cuts off a good part of their communicating options. They cannot read facial expression anymore. The result is a mounting number of cases of depression mainly among women. Mask wearing destroys social communication and emotional interaction. If done to young people over an extended period of time, it has the potential to deform the human personality and mind and leads to all sorts of dysfunctional behavior from depression over aggression to suicide. Small wonder that, according to hospital records, suicide of female teens has increased by 53% in 2021 over 2020.
Most people also do not realize that masks cover only their nose and their mouth – if that. Ears and eyes remain uncovered. You can contract a virus just as well via your eyes and your ears as via your mouth and nose. And most masks allow the air you inhale and exhale to circumvent the mask and pass through in areas, where the mask does not tightly fit against the skin of the face.
Most people also do not seem to realize that those little blue masks that have become the standard muzzle instrument in stores, banks, restaurants etc. are all made in China, the country that gave us SARS2 Cov and COVID. What do we know about operational hygiene and sterility in the Chinese factories that make these masks? The answer is: nothing. Can we be sure these masks are not already infected because the Chinese workers making them have COVID, too? The answer is: No.
Combine mask wearing with 6-foot “social” distance and you get a toxic mix that breeds physically and psychically sick people – as if we don’t have enough of them already.
“Vaccination” with gene-based mRNA “vaccines” was never been properly tested and it was never made sure that the vaccinated would not suffer serious long-term negative side effects. Even its inventor, Dr. Malone, stepped forth and warning against using mRNA vaccines indiscriminately before we know they are truly safe.
Today we have good reason to fear that mRNA vaccines may cause serious damages to the human body and immune system. Cancer, myocardia, internal bleeding, blood clotting, necrosis etc. as found by Dr. Burkhardt, Dr. Bhakdi and other pathologists in multiple vaccinated corpses.
In fact, gene-based mRNA substances are not really vaccines. Until recently, vaccine has been defined as a dead or weakened germ (bacterium or virus) that is introduced into the human body, mostly via injection, in order to cause a mild form of a disease that allows the body’s immune system to develop defenses (antibodies) against these bacteria and viruses. By contrast, mRNA substances send a nano-particle carried message to the body’s cells that convert normal cells into pseudo infected ones. This is a totally different concept from that of vaccination. However, instead of coming up with a new definition for ‘mRNA’, Webster’s Dictionary, watered down its definition of ‘vaccine’ and vaccination’ to include the use of mRNA substances. The definition was:
“A preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.”
Now it reads:
“A preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease.”
Webster then lists mRNA as one form of “stimulation of the body’s immune system” and conventional vaccination as another.
Initiating a weaker form of an infectious disease in the human body is sure not very similar to introducing a strand of synthesized messenger RNA in order to make body cells produce an antigenic substance such as a fragment of a pike protein. The former is making use of the capabilities of the body’s natural immune system. The latter is a genetic manipulation of the body’s immune system. Two entirely different approaches that should not be lumped together in a common concept. Using a common term, i.e. ‘vaccination’, for these fundamentally different procedures can only serve one purpose: to cloud the difference for non-physicians.
Remember King Fu Tse, who, when asked what he would do first, if he were the Emperor of China, said: “I would define the concepts!” He knew like todays socialists that, if you control human speech, you control the human mind.
We know now that mRNA “vaccinations” do not provide effective and lasting protection against SAR2 Cov infection. This is the reason why so many “booster” shots are needed. Hospitals begin to fill with newly infected and most of them are the multiple vaccinated. VAERS statistics support the suspicion that about as many people died from the negative side effects of the mRNA “vaccine” as died from COVID itself. Never mind the comorbidities.
Enter the lockdowns. I just read the new Johns Hopkins University study about the effectiveness of lockdowns. Instead of rewording their findings, let me simply quote their abstract:
“This systematic review and meta-analysis are designed to determine whether there is empirical evidence to support the belief that lockdowns” reduce COVID-19 mortality. Lockdowns are defined as the imposition of at least one compulsory, non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). NPIs are any government mandate that directly restrict peoples’ possibilities, such as policies that limit internal movement, close schools and businesses, and ban international travel. This study employed a systematic search and screening procedure in which 18,590 studies are identified that could potentially address the belief posed. After three levels of screening, 34 studies ultimately qualified. Of those 34 eligible studies, 24 qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. They were separated into three groups: lockdown stringency index studies, shelter-in-place-order (SIPO) studies, and specific NPI studies. An analysis of each of these three groups support the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality. More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average. SIPOs were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific NPI studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality. While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. Inconsequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.”
Amen. The mask mandate sucks, the vaccination mandate sucks, and the lock-downs suck. Is our government really so inept? Or did our government try to pull the wool over our eyes and use the alleged COVID crisis to wean us all of individual liberty, market capitalism, self-determination and free speech and force us for the “greater good” to become government serfs?
I do not know about you, folks, but as for me I subscribe to Thomas Jefferson’s philosophy who said:
“I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.”
And let me add: Even if slavery is imposed on me for medical reasons.